Strategy vs. Tactics
By Alain Burrese
I have spent over twenty-five years now studying, practicing, and
teaching martial arts. This includes
time spent in the United States Army and living in
Strategy
Strategy is the overall, big
picture, plan, which includes goals or desired outcomes.
In the military, strategy is the utilization, during both peace and war,
or all of a nation’s forces, through large-scale, long-range planning and
development, to ensure security or victory.
Another definition would be a plan, method, or series of maneuvers or
stratagems for obtaining a specific goal or result.
A well known strategy used by the Allies in WWII was that of strategic
bombing in
Strategic negotiation is simply the act of devising and carrying out a well thought out plan to achieve your desired outcomes. Often, it is your plan to convince another party to give you something that you want and on your terms. The first thing you must determine when developing a negotiation strategy is what do you really want? What is the purpose of the negotiation? Do you want to purchase a house or commercial building? Do you want a raise in your salary? Do you want to settle a matter that is being litigated? Once you know what you want, and have devised a strategy, you can implement the tactics that will help you achieve your desired outcome.
When one is developing strategy, it is often easier to break your planning into phases. Here is a simple model used with martial arts and warfare that you will notice fits with negotiating equally well:
1. Identify your strategic objectives
2. Collect intelligence
3. Plan for environment
4. Program for engagement
Tactics
Tactics are simply the means by which you carry out your strategy. In the military tactics deals with the use and deployment of troops in actual combat, more specifically, it is the military science that deals with securing objectives set by strategy, especially the technique of deploying and directing troops, ships, and aircraft in effective maneuvers against an enemy. In our example above with the Army Air Corps, the tight formations employed by the bombers to make the best use of the bombers’ heavy armament and prevent German fighters from singling out and swarming on lone planes is an example of a tactic used to help carry out the strategy. Another tactic was the employment of high altitude bombing when low level bombing proved to vulnerable to anti-aircraft fire.
One must be very careful not to focus upon activity, means, or tactics at the expense of accomplishment, achieving goals, or desired outcomes. Above all else, obtaining one’s objectives in negotiations should be paramount. Of course, the tactics, activities or means we use should always be appropriate and ethical, but we must remember they are merely the ways to attain desired outcomes. Examples of negotiation tactics include things such as:
1. Giving ultimatums
2. Nibbling
3. Shocked or surprised looks
4. Good cop/Bad cop
5. Walk away
There are many tactics people use while negotiating. I will be writing about a number of these in future columns. There is nothing wrong with using certain tactics to carry out your strategy and obtain your objectives. It is not necessarily unethical, deceptive, or unscrupulous to use negotiating tactics, even though some may want you to believe this. Yes, some tactics may be unethical, and as I stated above, we should always be appropriate and ethical, but there is nothing wrong with being competitive.
No, I have not forgotten the Principled Negotiation strategy taught by Fisher and Ury in “Getting To Yes.” However, I also realize that sometimes we will be in competitive negotiations, and knowing various tactics can give us the edge. Face it, some clients hire an attorney to be their pit bull, and while win-win might be the ideal, some of these clients only care about a win in their column. Practically speaking, we must deliver for our clients if we want to stay in business. Additionally, knowing various negotiation tactics, and the counterattacks, prepare us for when others use them against us.
Conclusion
Strategy and tactics are concepts as old as conflict itself. By understanding the differences and relationships between the two, the successful negotiator can better plan and implement the strategies and tactics to reach specific desired outcomes. There is a reason so many successful business people study the ancient military classics such as “The Art of War” and “The Book of Five Rings.” There is a reason why so many successful business people play strategic military games such as Go and Chess. The lessons learned from military sources, especially strategy and tactics, can easily be adapted to help us be better business people, better litigators, and better negotiators.
Alain Burrese is a mediator and attorney with Bennett Law Office, P.C. in Missoula, MT. He conducts mediations and settlement conferences as well as speaking and training in negotiation and mediation. He can be contacted at: www.bennettlawofficepc.com or (406) 543-5803.
This article first appeared in "The Montana Lawyer" February 2007 issue.
Return to the Articles main page.